Octopus Shield OCTOPUSSHIELD

Evidence & validation

Evidence you can inspect.

Two different things live on this page: the validation record for the platform itself, and the measured figures behind the claims made across this site.

Internal AI Security Validation — 2026
Navy — landscape · OS-AIV-2026-0001

Internal AI Security Validation — 2026

Self-issued engineering validation attestation.

This is an internal validation attestation issued by Octopus Shield / Çelebi Bilişim Ltd. It is not an accredited third-party certification.
Reference
OS-AIV-2026-0001
Year
2026
Type
Internal validation attestation
Accreditation
Not accredited
Issuer
Octopus Shield Engineering / Çelebi Bilişim Ltd.

All five presentation variants

These are five visual variants of one record, not five separate certifications.

The archival PDF carries the earlier visible product name. It is kept unmodified as a source document; the current brand name is Octopus Shield.

What you receive when we find one.

This is a complete finding report, filled with synthetic data. Nothing here is a real customer or a real detection — it shows the shape and the depth of what lands in your inbox.

Sample report →

Where the 83 seconds actually falls

Distribution of the gap between a certificate entering a Certificate Transparency log and our pipeline reading it. Measured on 19 August 2026 over a 150-second live run.

Detection latency distribution Histogram: most certificates are read 70–90 seconds after their log timestamp. 0 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 2,453 p50 p90 6080100120140160180200 Seconds
Certificates
Seconds Certificates%
60–70 Seconds 157 %2.3
70–80 Seconds 2,453 %35.8
80–90 Seconds 2,304 %33.6
90–100 Seconds 918 %13.4
100–110 Seconds 379 %5.5
110–120 Seconds 220 %3.2
120–130 Seconds 111 %1.6
130–140 Seconds 85 %1.2
140–150 Seconds 70 %1.0
150–160 Seconds 67 %1.0
160–170 Seconds 57 %0.8
170–180 Seconds 21 %0.3
180–190 Seconds 7 %0.1
190–200 Seconds 7 %0.1
200–210 Seconds 2 %0.0

Sample: 6,858 certificates · 6,858 of 6,858 timestamps readable · median 83 s · p90 108 s. This is not the time to find a fake site — only the gap between the log's own timestamp and our reading of it.

Measured figures behind the claims.

Each figure below comes from a run that was recorded, with its date. Nothing here is extrapolated into a rate or a guarantee.

FigureValueMeasuredWhat it does not mean
Active Certificate Transparency logs919 Aug 2026Not a claim of complete log coverage
Automated checks passed284 / 28419 Aug 2026Covers the codebase's own test suite, not production behaviour under load
Runtime application dependencies019 Aug 2026Applies to the application runtime, not to the hosting platform
Certificates read in one 30-second local run1,17419 Aug 2026A single measured run, not a sustained throughput rate
Median time from CT log entry to our pipeline83 s19 Aug 2026Not the time to find a fake site — only the gap between the log's own timestamp and our reading of it

What we have not measured.

These are published as unknown rather than estimated.

  • Detection coverage as a percentage of all impersonating domains.
  • Production uptime.
  • False-positive rate across a labelled dataset.